Accredited Business Valuation (ABV) Practice Test 2025 – The Comprehensive All-in-One Guide to Exam Success!

Question: 1 / 400

In the Estate of Jelke case, what adjustment should be made to the asset's value?

The asset value should be increased

Tax implications should not affect value

The value should be reduced by built-in capital gains tax

The Estate of Jelke case emphasizes the importance of considering tax implications in business valuation. Specifically, when valuing an asset, one must recognize the potential taxes that would be incurred upon its sale, such as built-in capital gains tax. This tax represents a significant financial obligation that the owner would face if they sold the asset, thereby impacting its net value to the owner.

Incorporating this adjustment reflects a more accurate assessment of the asset’s worth, as it provides a clearer picture of the actual financial benefits that the asset could generate in the hands of a hypothetical buyer. By reducing the value by the amount of the built-in capital gains tax, the valuation aligns more closely with the economic reality faced by the estate.

This perspective ensures that the valuation does not overlook liabilities that would materialize from a disposition of the asset, allowing heirs or potential buyers to understand the true value based on after-tax consequences.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

A flat reduction of 10% should be applied

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy